![]() ![]() There is a bit of inconsistency in your argument. The carpet scenario is yet another ‘special’ circumstance that can needs to be addressed appropriately, but which should not be used as the justifying norm. No one implied that piano (S&S D) was going to be mindlessly pushed around. ![]() Terry, you too end up setting up something of a ‘red herring’. (And, as an afterthought, is it possible that the metric weight would have included brass concert wheels, while the English measurement was without? ) Meanwhile, while Horace was quick to correct his dissemination of the flawed weight data found on the Steinway website (and thus, not a flaw – a feature?), his estimate of hundreds of other variables. > *To:* *Subject:* Re: Steinway D casters > *From:* [mailto: *On Behalf Of *Joseph Garrett > a piano truck for someone’s gracious living room? > idea of ANY of the specific circumstances. > the assumed resources and the motives behind the choice. > the purpose of the casters, the perceived financial dissonance between > You made a series of assumptions in proffering your response, including > that the hardest thing to quantify, definitively, is human stupidity. > range of ‘best’, ‘normal’, and ‘worst-case’ situations, keeping in mind > interesting to have real numbers to assign to those stresses, in a > generation of such pronouncements, they’re true only in the most cosmic ![]() While I am loath to deny you the visceral pleasure derived from the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |